Discrimination on interracial dating Wlfes free cam com
Instead, it sought to clarify that under the provisions of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act enacted by Kentucky in 2013, businesses could not be punished for violating local ordinances that prohibit discrimination based on sexual preference or gender identity if the discriminatory practices were based on “sincerely held religious beliefs“: Government shall not substantially burden a person’s freedom of religion.
The right to act or refuse to act in a manner motivated by a sincerely held religious belief may not be substantially burdened unless the government proves by clear and convincing evidence that it has a compelling governmental interest in infringing the specific act or refusal to act and has used the least restrictive means to further that interest.
Irrespective of this, there still remains the issue of sexual racism in the online dating world, in that preferences appear to follow a racial hierarchy.
The exclusion of races dissimilar to one's own is a main feature of sexual racism, however a reluctance to date inter-racially predominantly spans from the discriminatory views often possessed by those in society, as opposed to purely a same-race individual preference.
Moreover, this racial discrimination also deviates into the form of the sexual dehumanisation of individuals of other racial identities.
It is the discrimination between potential sexual or romantic partners on the basis of perceived racial identity.
However, not everyone agrees that this should be classified as racism, some argue that distinguishing among partners on the basis of perceived race is not racism at all but a justifiable personal preference.
A vaguely worded bill (SB180) proposes expanded protections for Kentucky residents seeking to deny services based on sincerely held religious beliefs.